capital punishment on metal re essays

capital punishment on metal re essays As I read Atkins v. Virginia, I was easily reflected on my own experiences with family members and close friends, who suffer from mental impairments. The views and opinions of people vary from mild too extreme. First and far most we are constantly reminded of this by the media. In such case where the criminal is aware of their actions and the consequences tend to plea for insanity in lieu of a lighter sentence. However, we must not forget those who are truly classified as mentally retarded. According to the definition from the Individuals with Disability Education Act (IDEAS) and in the state of Virginia, psychological evaluation on an individual current level of functioning and met IQ requirements Substantially limited in present functioning that is characterized by significantly sub-average intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with related limitations in two or more of the following: applicable adaptive skills area; communication; self-care; home living; social skills; community use; self direction; health and safety; functional academics; leisure and work manifested before the age 18. www.co.henrico.va.us/mhmr. Mental retardation can under the law can only be considered by the approach of a realistic picture of the individual. It also recognizes that the picture can change. As the person grows and learns, his or her ability to get along in the world grows as well. The prosecution and trial of Capital defendants are notoriously flawed. These flaws are magnified when the defendant has mental retardation. Once the person is competent to stand trial, the mental retardation person is deemed capable of understanding the nature and purpose of the legal proceedings and of cooperating, communicating and working with defense counsel. Many people with retardation relinquish critical rights simply...